Normally when a band releases an album less than 2 years apart from their previous album people would be like - that's perfectly acceptable; even a 3 year gap is fine. But the 1975 had planned to have a 6 month gap between albums. Due to various reasons it took another year on top of the 6 months to get this record out. Some people did actually become impatient over this but personally I think if you look at the big picture, 18 months between albums is more than acceptable.
When this album first came out, the first thing that struck me was that it was 22 tracks and 1 hour and 20 minutes long. This is not a deluxe version of the album or with bonus tracks added. This is the album. It made me wonder whether this was an ambitious album or a brave move by the band or both. Originally. having listened to the album a number of times now I discounted this as being an ambitious album. Although they are trying new things and sounds, there are no 10 minute tracks or anything totally out with their comfort zone. But after thinking about it some more I changed my mind. Putting out a 22 track album and having all those tracks work together to create a cohesive album is indeed ambitious.
So is this a brave move for the band then? Most bands release albums which are 10-13 tracks maybe stretching up to 15. There are of course of exceptions but the number of tracks on most classic albums fall within this range. But the number of tracks bands write for an album is often a lot more than this. Writing often 30 plus songs with no real ceiling. Then they whittle it down to 10-13 tracks to fit on the album. They pick the songs based on how good they are and how they fit on the album. The 1975 have 22 tracks on this album so I do wonder how many songs were discarded through these sessions. But on paper there will be some bands out there who wrote just over 22 songs for an album and discarded 12 of them. So did quality control hold up letting so many songs on the new album?
Firstly lets go back to the original question on whether this was a brave move for the band? Personally I think it was. Every track you add on increases the likelihood of introducing a weaker track. And when talking about classic albums you always talk about the albums that don't have a weak track on them. If you have 22 tracks the risk really is massive. They could have gone the direction of getting it down to 10 to 15 tracks then releasing the other tracks later as part of a deluxe edition. But they chose not to and made a longer album so in my opinion they were brave.
The first time I heard "The 1975" track when they released it I was annoyed it was a spoken word track and you couldn't even distinguish it as a 1975 track due to the faint music in the background. They did have a spoken word track on "A breif inquiry into online relationships" called "The Man Who Married A Robot/Love Theme". I thought this was one of the weaker tracks on the album purely because it was spoken word and often skip it nowadays. When I then first listened to "The 1975" off "Notes" and found it was the first track on the album I was even more annoyed. For their first 3 albums they have done an instrumental on the first track called "The 1975". Each time it had the same tune to it but done in different ways. For me it became a staple of each album they did and really showed their identity. It was a unique thing that not many bands do. When they called it "The 1975" and didn't have this tune for the first track of the album that is the reason I was annoyed.
Since then however my opinion has changed for a couple of reasons. 1. I found out who was speaking. 2. I listened to what she was speaking about. The answer was Greta Thunberg who is probably one of the most famous teenagers on the planet right now and is a leading climate change activist. And obviously the speech was about climate crisis facing the world. The world is focused so much about Corona Virus at the moment its easy to forget that there is a problem out there which could be argued is even bigger than Corona Virus and that is the Climate emergency. So what better way to promote it than take the person who is driving things forward the most in the climate change battle and give her a platform to potentially millions more.
The reason why spoken word annoys me is because you hear a speech once - more often than not you don't have to hear it again and again. Albums on the other hand are meant to be listened to again and again. Which is why I don't think spoken word really works on albums. But there are always exceptions and this is a major exception. This message and especially the way Greta has delivered it here needs to be drilled into people so they hear it over and over again. So I think this is the perfect move from the band and is the right way to start the album. If you are going to break your staple of how you start your albums, you need to have a good reason. Greta Thunberg talking about the climate change crisis is a good reason.
The second track on the album "People" was the second single to be released following "The 1975" like it does on the album. This is one of the most refreshing and original tracks they have ever done. I'm not saying its original to the music world as a whole. There are plenty of punk/hard rock bands out there. But this is the first time for the 1975 to be doing this sort of track. It's heavy, it's explosive, it has a lot of passion running through it and it's a great track. The riff in it actually reminds me of Queens of the stone age a bit. This track to me does actually have genius placement on the album too. Coming after that intense speech by Greta. Matty starts this song by screaming "Wake up, wake up, wake up". As almost a reaction to Greta's speech. Saying to people look you have to sit up and pay attention to her. At the time when the single was released I did wonder if this was the direction the band were going to take with release of the new album. Turns out this track is the only one like it on the album.
I realise I could go into every track on the album here. But I thought it would be better to group the tracks into the types of songs on the album to give people more of an idea into how the albums is made up, then discuss the different groups of tracks. So below shows; the type of track, before this shows how many of those type of tracks appear on the album, then after the type of track it shows the track numbers which are that type of track:
1 Spoken Word - Track 1
1. Punk Rock/hard rock - Track 2
9 Pop - Tracks - 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 22
3 Instrumental - Tracks - 3, 5, 18
5 Electronic synth type Tracks - 7, 12, 15, 19, 20
3 Acoustic/piano ballads - Tracks 9, 17, 21
As I previously mentioned the first 2 tracks on this album, really compliment each other well. But that is just one example on this album which shows just how well thought out the track placing is on this album and just how well it all comes together. If you look at the different groups of track you can see there are only two instances where similar types of tracks are placed together (13, 14 and 19,20). They have mixed everything in here to create peaks and trough, happy points and reflective points, guitar tracks and synth tracks, with vocals and without vocals. It's all in here and it all flows really well. A good example of this is "Jesus Christ..." then "Roadkill" then "Me and You...". It is like a trajectory. It goes from soft ballad, to slightly more upbeat pop track in Roadkill, then full on upbeat track In "Me and you...". Another example is the instrumental "Streaming" which actually seamlessly goes into the next track "Birthday party".
The 1975 do call themselves a pop band. For a while I did have a problem with this as when you think of pop music you generally think of acts who have come out of reality TV shows or people who have songs written for them. Not that there is anything wrong with this but The 1975 don't really fit this mould. But by the same account The 1975 aren't a rock band either. "People" is the only track you could really put into this category and you can't pigeon hole a band based on one track. The 9 tracks I have identified as Pop though are accessible, easy to listen to tracks with guitars. And they are songs you can crank up the volume in your car and sing along to. None more so than singles "You and Me together song" which is the happiest, most joyful and uplifting song on the album. And also "If you're too shy (let me know), another uplifting track which peaks with a fantastic saxophone solo.
The second biggest group in terms of type of track on the album is the electronic synth type tracks. This is something The 1975 haven't really got into as much on previous albums as they have done as this one. And is another reason why this album is more ambitious than its predecessors. In the likes of "Yeah I know" and "What should I say", Matt Healy is using distorted vocals here which adds a further dimension to the tracks and the album.
There are 3 instrumental type tracks on the albums which almost act like interludes. The first one coming in at track 3 entitled "The End (Music for cars)". There is a nice orchestral arrangement around this track and comes fittingly right after "People" and you feel due to the intensity of that track, a nice relaxing track is what you need to calm down. But my favourite instrumental on the album comes at track 18 named "Having No Head". This track takes a while to get going but is amazing once it does. It just has this hypnotic beat and is so captivating.
The last group of tracks and by no means least is the piano/acoustic ballad style tracks which are; "Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America", "Playing on my mind" and "Don't worry". "Jesus Christ 2005..." is my favourite track of the whole album. It is just stunning. It has a simple guitar loop throughout the song with horns coming in at the start, then the bridge which also has horns between Matty and Phoebe Bridgers vocals. There was no bridge back between Phoebe Bridgers vocals and Mattys vocals to finish which is the only slight flaw with this song. But the structure is so different and yet so simple to your typical song. No big choruses. No verse chorus, verse chorus, bridge chorus etc. Just Matty singing then bridge, Phoebe singing, then Matty singing with the most delicate guitar loop. And I have to say when Phoebe vocals come in I get actual goosebumps.
"Playing on my mind" has the same kind of feel to it in terms of Matty's tone when he sings - its just so gentle and relaxing with an acoustic guitar again. "Don't worry" is the second last track and is the piano ballad. Personally I think this would have been a better album closer than "Guys". While "Don't Worry" would still not be up to how they finished their previous album ("I always want to die sometimes"), I just think this piano ballad is a more fitting ending to an album than a popier track. I just think its better to go out on a gentler track. But obviously they didn't think so. Just a minor opinion difference there though.
Overall this is one hell of a rollercoaster of an album. Brave, ambitious and compelling are just a few words I would choose to describe. I have to say I have never had so much to say about any album ever and I have done over 100 album reviews. This album requires patience and an open mind. They are trying new things here which take a bit of time to get into. But there is also the pop side of this album where there are many tracks which are and have been sure fire hits. This album really does have it all and most importantly because there is so much to it, it has longevity as its an album where every listen you will discover something new. Whether this will go down as a classic album by the masses remains to be seen. But I would be shocked if this wasn't high up in my top 10 albums of the year list for 2020.